Brazil Court Rules Car Wash Judge Was Biased In Lula Cases

RIO DE JANEIRO: Brazils Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former judge Sergio Moro was biased in the way he oversaw former President Luiz Incio Lula da Silvas corruption trial, providing vindication for the leftist leader who has long claimed political persecution.

The decision further darkens the shadow over the reputation of Moro and the sweeping Car Wash corruption investigation he presided over for years. He sentenced hundreds of business and political leaders previously believed to enjoy impunity, and transformed himself into one of the Brazils best-known public figures. Some hailed him as a hero while others accused him of being a zealot.

In this case what is discussed is something that for me is key: everyone has the right to a fair trial, due legal process, and the impartiality of the judge, said Justice Carmen Lucia, who cast the tie-breaking vote.

Leaked messages published by The Intercept Brasil in 2019 showed apparent collusion between Moro and Car Wash prosecutors during the process that ultimately jailed da Silva for corruption and money laundering. His conviction on appeal sidelined him from the 2018 presidential elections, pursuant to the rules of Brazils Clean Slate law, and allowed fringe lawmaker Jair Bolsonaro to cruise to victory. Moro quickly became Bolsonaros justice minister.

Tuesdays ruling follows a separate decision from Justice Edson Fachin on March 8 to annul da Silvas two convictions, on the grounds that he was tried in a court without proper jurisdiction, and establishing that he could be retried in federal court in capital Brasilia.

Da Silvas attorneys, Cristiano Zanin Martins and Valeska Martins, said in a statement that the decision was historic and reinvigorating.

We proved that Moro never acted as a judge, but as a personal and political adversary of former President Lula, they said. Da Silva is universally known as Lula in Brazil. We suffered all sorts of illegalities in the Car Wash, some of them described in the ruling that recognized the bias of the former judge, such as the illegal monitoring of our phones so members of the investigation could follow the defense strategy in real time.

While the decision earlier this month cleared the way for da Silva to face off against Bolsonaro in 2022 elections, it was also interpreted by legal experts as a means to head off a ruling on allegations of Moros bias, and in so doing preserve the convictions and credibility of Car Wash. Another justice called for a vote on the pending matter regardless.

With their 3-2 decision on Tuesday, the justices prohibited evidence gathered in the Car Wash probe about da Silvas alleged ownership of a triplex in the beach town of Guaruja from being used in any eventual trial. The justices didnt rule whether evidence gathered previously could be used when retrying da Silvas other conviction, or in his other two unresolved criminal cases.

Michael Mohallem, coordinator of the Justice Center of the Getulio Vargas Foundation, said the ruling brings any corruption proceedings against da Silva back to square one, and solidifies his 2022 candidacy. But it also provides a glimmer of hope for others who have been jailed.

Lula will be able to say he was persecuted by a judge who wanted to convict him. For the political campaign, thats very valuable, Mohallem added. The fear is that many inmates will present cases to annul their sentences. The ruling opens that discussion.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Thank You

Leave a Reply